Literary Interdisciplinary Research

A Comparative Analysis of Aime Cesaire’s The Tempest and Gholam Hossein Saedi’s Eye for an Eye from the perspective of Michel Foucault

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Hoda Esmaeiltabar 1
Esmaeil Najar 2

1 M.A in Drama, Faculty of Arts, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 (Corresponding Author). Assistant Professor of Drama, Collage of Arts, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

10.30465/lir.2022.40154.1467
Abstract
Conducting comparative literary studies is one of the essential subjects and approaches in literature nowadays. American school of comparative literature provides a suitable framework for research on themes, opinions, and hidden concepts of works irrespective of their original language. In this article, we compare the play An Eye for an Eye, by an Iranian playwright Gholam Hossein Saedi, and The Tempest by a French Black writer and poet Aime Cesaire. This research, by using the American school of comparative literature and by drawing from Foucault's theories, scrutinizes the similarities and differences between these two plays. In Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Foucault explains various governments' methods of punishment throughout history. People in power, by using their own approved system of thoughts and punishments, put common people of society under pressure, and chastise them. Foucault does not necessarily think these punishments are deterrent or adequate to the crime committed by a criminal, yet his/her body is used as a penal and correctional system. It will be examined that in these two cases the kings’ presence as the highest member of power is the only determinant of punishment. The absence of a judiciary system in both plays highlights the fact that much of the government's actions are baseless and biased. In An Eye for an Eye, the dominant system prefers corporal punishments whereas in The Tempest it privileges the mental/psychological one. Foucault believes that dominant institutions sometimes use punishment for its dramatic nature in order to intimidate people. This nature of punishment is represented and noticeable in both of our selected plays.
 

Keywords

Aime Cesaire
Gholam Hossein Saedi
The Tempest
Eye for an Eye
Michel Foucault

Subjects

Hasanpour Alashti, Hossein and Sadat Ghafouri, Efat (2013). The Psychological Criticism of Gholam Hossein Saedi’s Two Brothers, Research in Narrative Literature, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1-16. [In Persian].

Horri, Abolfazl (2022). “Interaction of Interdisciplinary and Cultural Studies in Comparative Literature”, Literary Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 4, No. 8, pp. 111-134. [In Persian].

Isazadeh HajiAgha, Mohammad, Moshfeghi, Arash, Hojaji Kahjuq, Aziz, (2020). “The Comparative Semiology of Gholām-Hossein Sā'edi’s Azā'dārān-e Bayal and Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis”, Journal of Comparative Literature, Vol. 11, No. 21, pp. 127-153. [In Persian].

Johnson, Robert (1998). Death Work: A Study of the Modern Execution Process, 2nd edition, Wadsworth: Belmont.
Jost, François. Anoushirvani, Alireza (1974). “Philosophy and New Theories in Literature”, Comparative Literature Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 8, pp. 37-56.
Manavi Sume Bozorg, Fatemeh and Rahimi, Seyed Mahdi and Azizi, Mohammadreza (2014). "Comparative Analysis of Dramatic Elements of Pygmalion by Tawfik Al-Hakim and Pygmalion by Gholamhossein Saedi", Research in Comparative Literature, Vol. 6, No. 2,  pp. 209-235. [In Persian].
Mohammad Nezhad Ali Zamini, Yousef, Rezaei, Ramezan, Ali Akbari, Parinaz (2020). “A Comparative Study of Non-Verbal Communication in Ancient Persian and Arabic Poetry”, Literary Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 274-294. [In Persian].
Nixon, Rob (1987). “Caribbean and African Appropriations of The Tempest: Critical Inquiry”, Politics and Poetic Value, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 557-578.
Qavami, Badriah, Mansouri, Nemat, Barzoui, Reza, Adhami, Jamal. (2023). "Sociological Reading of Azadaran Bil by Gholamhossein Saedi based on Bakhtin's Polyphonic Theory", Literary Interdisciplinary Research, published online. doi: 10.30465/lir.2023.44450.1670 [In Persian].
Rizvan Talab, Zainab, Mehrabi, Marzieh (2017). "The Study of Cultural Consequences of Colonialism in Driss Chraïbi's works in the Light of Aimée Césaire's Ideas", Journal of Research in Contemporary world Literature, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 393-414. [In Persian].
Saedi, Gholamhossein (Goharmorad) (1972). Eye for an Eye, 2nd edition, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publication. [In Persian].
Sarsangi, Majid, Amini, Farhad, Rashidi, Sadegh (2019). "Mechanism of Encountering with the Other in ā-yi bā kulāh ā-yi bī kulāh Based on Cultural Semiotics Approach", Sociological Journal of Art and Literature, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 45-68. [In Persian].
Soro N'golo, Aboudou (2012). “From Tragic Misunderstanding to Revolutionary Myth: The Journey of Aimé Césaire's Dramatic Hero”, Revue des Études de la Langue Française,  Vol. 27 , No. 5, pp 4-26.
Turner, Victor (1986). The Anthropology of Performance, Boston: PAJ Publications.
 
 

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us